The Battle for Boston: Marxist Resistance of 'Resist Marxism'
Citizen Kane | Monday, November 13, 2017 -- 11:33 AM EST
***Uploaded by CitizensDawn and Last updated on Tuesday, July 30, 2019 -- 8:36 PM EDT***

Patriot group 'Resist Marxism' reminiscent of the Brave 300 Spartans who stood before the hordes of Xerxes as they withstand what can be best described as a Marxist onslaught of intimidation, violence, and propaganda.

On Saturday, November 18, 2017, a group called 'Resist Marxism' will be hosting a 'Rally for the Republic' in the Boston Common to – according to an October 30 press release – 'celebrate America, support the Constitution, and honor veterans;' patriotic messages the group says are under attack by, as the name implies, a Cultural Marxist agenda.

A report from the Boston Herald's Jordan Graham and Brian Dowling detailed Boston Mayor Marty Walsh's disappointment with what he says is the groups inability to work with them.

“It’s disappointing. There’s no respect here at all,” Walsh said. “It’s unfortunate. It’s sad. It’s sad that they can’t work with us for one day. One day. We were asking for one day. We will see what happens but it’s disappointing.”

“There’s no message — they don’t have a message. They are just looking to cause headaches and trouble,” Walsh would go on to say, expressing his confusion surrounding the message the group 'Resist Marxism' had.

A confusion easily had by Walsh, it would appear, given how he prefaced the 'Boston Free Speech Rally' that took place months before in August.

“They recommend that people should not confront these rallies. So we’re urging everyone to stay away from the Common,” Walsh said equating 'Boston Free Speech' with “Nazis,” “white supremacists,” and the group behind the Charlottesville rally that took place the week before. “The courts have made it abundantly clear. They have the right to gather, no matter how repugnant their views are. But they don’t have the right to create unsafe conditions. They have the right to free speech. In return, they have to respect our city.”

Ironically, Walsh's widely publicized, inaccurate comments prompted tens of thousands to come out and protest the August rally and led to dozens arrested, dozens more assaulted, and many unable to peaceably gather and express themselves, as police sealed off entrance into the event over safety concerns.

“If Mayor Walsh is really concerned about how the road race will be affected, then we suggest that he correct his slanderous statements from August which greatly contributed to the threats and violence,” Resist Marxism said in their press release about the concerns the Mayor has expressed for people in the common that day. “For instance, he could state that he was mistaken when he equated the free speech rally with hate groups.”

The Charlottesville Swindlers

Jason Kessler, who according to the SPLC is a former Obama supporter and an organizer for the left wing activist group Occupy Wall Street, was the organizer of 'Unite the Right', the group responsible for the Charlottesville white supremacist rally that joined with others who were already protesting the removal of confederate monuments.

While it can't be clear whether or not the confusion surrounding the events was deliberately misrepresented as such, the absence of a correction by the Mayor's office would indicate that such a confusion is deliberate. Such disinformation, propaganda campaigns and intimidation tactics were widely imposed by the Marxist and Maoist Communists, and taking this into account would certainly give the group's confusing message some clarity.

This comes after over a year of events across college campuses featuring conservative speakers were shut down because of the security risk posed by violent mobs who rallied around accusations of “white supremacy, racism and Nazi.” These mobs were led by violent groups such as ANTIFA, the group who's most recently been implicated colluding with extremist groups Al Qaeda and ISIS in Germany, according to an FBI investigation the Daily Mail's Edward Klein reports. Antifa was also exposed by an investigation by Stephen Crowder to be planing deliberate acts of violence in California. The most shocking conclusion of Crowder's reports was the mainstream media's tacit endorsement of Antifa and their operations as not one media outlet chose to pick up his bombshell report. ANTIFA was also present at the Boston Free Speech rally in August.

MSNBC's Chuck Todd conducted an interview with Mark Bray, Dartmouth Professor and author of the book “ANTIFA: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,” during which Bray argued that “there's a big difference between confronting fascism and confronting other forms of violence.”

“We can see that during the 30s and 40s there was no public opinion to be leveraged by nonviolent resistance,” Bray said. “If you get fascists to be powerful enough in government they're simply not going to listen to the kind of public opinion that non-violence can generate.” Bray would go on to cite justification for his preemptive violence rationale with previous “attacks on mosques and attacks on synagogues.”

When you see that many of such attacks have been exposed as 'false flag', hate hoax type of staged events, one could easily see problems with his rationale, that is, if one is actually opposed to Fascists.

On Nov. 9, William Tucker of Southern New Jersey was arrested in Philadelphia for vandalizing homes and vehicles with messages like “Trump Rules” and “Black Bitch.”

On May 3, 2017, Brown County Prosecutor Ted Adams filed a criminal mischief charge against George Nathaniel “Nathan” Stang, the organist at St. David's Episcopal Church, for vandalizing the church with fake pro-Trump Nazi graffiti.

In USA Today's Nov. 8 report by Greg Toppo titled “Air Force Academy says racial slurs outside dorm rooms were a hoax,” Toppo reports how a hate hoax prompted a response from Lt. Gen. Jay Silveria excoriating the fictitious, intolerant individuals responsible in a speech that went viral “garnering more that 2 million views on YouTube.”

In October of this year, “University of Maryland police say 52-year-old Ronald Alford Sr. was served a criminal summons on Thursday and faces several charges including destruction of property and disturbing the operations of a school” when he was charged with spray-painting a swastika inside campus living quarters.

During the election, the investigative journalism group Project Veritas uncovered that the DNC was hiring people of color to go to Trump rallies to incite violence so that they could get images to be used in propaganda slandering Trump and his supporters as racists.

One can only imagine the psychological effect this level of disinformation is having on people, or can we see it too?

We have seen the same confusion misrepresented when following President Trump's comments accurately and Presidentially condemning the Charlottesville violence from 'many sides,' many people are beginning to wonder if these people are journalists or what the President likes term 'fake news' propagandists.

“This Free Speech Movement is dedicated to peaceful rallies and are in no way affiliated with the Charlottesville rally on 8/12/17,” an Aug. 15 statement from Boston Free Speech's facebook page reads. “While we maintain that every individual is entitled to their freedom of speech and defend that basic human right, we will not be offering our platform to racism or bigotry. We denounce the politics of supremacy and violence. We denounce the actions, activities, and tactics of the so-called Antifa movement. We denounce the normalization of political violence.”

Pol Pot Politique

Another disturbing trend is for Mayors to – after hyping the conflict between demonstrators with inaccurate, libelous, slanderous labels of 'Nazis' and 'White Supremacists' – order the Police to stand down and allow for the violence to ensue and demonstrators to clash, which is what happened during the “March 4 Trump” rally protests which was reported by Risk&Reward's Elizabeth MacDonald in
an interview with Harmeet Dhillon.

“You had thousands of people that were marching in the streets to oppose bigotry and racism,” Berkley Mayor Jesse Arreguín said about the conservative speakers invited to Berkley to speak at the Aug. 27 event. “There was a 95-year-old Holocaust survivor, children, families — it really reflected Berkeley’s diversity.”

Of course, the majority of the people showing up to the events are there to express their concerns over a culture of safe spaces and hate-speech that is profoundly un-American; concerns about seeing places in America where having nationalistic, patriotic notions while having white skin means you're a “white nationalist.” However, that might just be the point.

Remarkably, under the leadership of the Obama administration, the culture among the Democrats has morphed into opposition of an “aggressive kind of nationalism,” as former President Obama articulated when he spoke before the Fourth Congress of the Indonesian Diaspora.

Apparently “aggressive kind” meaning any kind of nationalism whatsoever. Borders, citizenship, constitutional governance, these are principles that define America, not what Obama said was an “international rule of law” and “tolerance” of such law, no matter how unreasoned.

America is a sovereign Constitutional Republic, not a global empire where the rule of law is the dictate of any one person or body, nor is it subject to any such empire. Having sovereign nation states in turn translates into republican global governance, where representation of the people within each nation state among the global diaspora is secured by the sovereignty of those people's nation state.

With statements like those made by Obama, the message would appear to be an attempt to associate American concepts outlined here with unsavory labels of “intolerance” and “lawlessness.”

This association is what seems to be the concern of groups like Resist Marxism who seek to hold rallies celebrating the American culture and principles they feel are under assault after having witnessed what's happening in places like Berkley, Charlottesville and Boston.

However, in Charlottesville there actually were White Supremacists or Nazis there to help the Antifa minded justify their violent urges to silence others speech, or at the very least there were people there who were pretending to be white supremacists as a kind of 'psy op' as described earlier.

Dr. Steve Pieczenik outlined this likelihood in his analysis of the Charlottesville events, pointing toward the shady shared history of Richard Spencer, organizer of various white supremacist groups and rallies, with Charlottesville Mayor Michael Signer.

“Interesting that Signer worked for John Podesta the Molesta and was in Obama’s State Department Transition Team,” Pieczenik points out. “This prissy she-man just like Spencer lived in Arlington Va. and graduated Magnum Cum Laude from Princeton University in political science. Just like Spencer, he went on to the University of California, Berkley and received his law degree from guess where? Yes, the University of Virginia Law School. So both opponents went to the same school and lived in the same places?”

Dr. Pieczenik is an “expert in psychological warfare, political psychology, regime change, intelligence, counterintelligence and covert operations” who served in the State Department under the Reagan administration, and in a court of law we can't conclusively prove what the court of public opinion can begin to see, at least not yet.

What we can prove is that there seems to be consistent tactics used by those in power to derail events like 'Rally for the Republic.'

What we saw start to develop after countless rallies and speeches were shut down at Berkley by violent ANTIFA mobs because of the inaction by police, was demonstrators with gas-masks, shields, helmets, goggles and clubs to protect themselves. In Charlottesville, the police herded the protesters and counter protesters together, ostensibly to encourage a clash and ensuring violence between groups that had already been documented to be violent.

“Resist Marxism calls upon Mayor Walsh to ask counter demonstrators to stay away from the road race participants and from our rally,” Resist Marxism said in their press release, while expressing their concern for the government's ability to ensure their right to peaceably assemble and express themselves. “The counter protesters are the ones that brought violence and hate into Boston back in August. We also call upon the administration to enforce Massachusetts General Law Chapter 268 Section 34 against disguising oneself with the intent to intimidate or disrupt those exercising their rights under the Constitution. We believe many of the counter protesters who are likely to be violent will not show up if they cannot hide their faces.”

The Berkley Bruisers

Resist Marxism has also complained about how the Mayor and the city of Boston has handled their attempt to obtain a permit for the day they say was “still available on the website when others were not” at the time they applied for the permit on Nov. 18. This, they say, has caused problems for the organizers and those who they say will be traveling from out of state to attend the event, who, after not receiving a response from the City of Boston, went ahead and made travel arrangements for the chosen date.

“Per the permit guide on the Parks and Recreation website, 'An email within 10 business days will be sent for approval or denial of your request.' We never received an email within 10 business days approving or denying the request,” Resist Marxism explained in the Oct. 30 press release. “In fact, the request was not denied until Oct. 26, more than 25 business days later and after we had begun working with the Department on the permit.”

This is reminiscent of the tactics used by the school administration at UC Berkley who made it “impossible” for the conservative student group “Berkley Patriot” to organize their event featuring conservative speaker Milo Yianopolis. Outlined in a letter from the group's counsel to University Chancellor Stephen C. Sutton, the student group accused the University of having refused “to allow our clients to attend meetings with legal counsel present and issued arbitrary deadlines with impossibly short times to comply.”

In addition to the impossible “bureaucratic demands” and communication failures by the school administration that prohibited the students' first amendment rights, the letter accused the university of indirect physical intimidation by failing “to protect our students from physical assault and vandalism by UC Berkley students and in some cases, faculty/staff” in addition to failing to take “proper disciplinary steps against persons and groups on campus that engage in acts of violence.”

The letter goes on to reference the group By Any Means Necessary (BAMN), which was allowed by the University to solicit “students to join in the violence at the Milo event in February” in classes during scheduled classroom instruction time paid for by the students to gain an education.

It's worth noting that the BAMN organizer, Yvette Falarca, openly promotes violence to shut down political speech she disagrees with, hence the name. She equates those who are critical of Islam, concerned about open borders and immigration with fascists who are trying to “threaten us, intimidate us, rape us, kill us” and thus need to be shut down “by any means necessary.” Take note Mayor Walsh.

“It is unfortunate that the city has decided to drag Camp Harborview and their event into all of this. We discussed this in our negotiations, and the city continued to work with us for a permit on the date of Nov. 18,” Resist Marxism expressed in their press release. “If the race was already permitted and would be in any way affected by our rally, then why did the department take so long to deny the request?”

In what appears to be another intimidation attempt, the Permit Department of the Department of Parks and Recreation leaked their tardy response letter rejecting Resist Marxism's request for a permit on Nov. 18 to the press. The leaked letter included the unredacted organizer's name, personal telephone number, and address on the letter head, which the Boston Globe's Nik DeCosta-Klipa then published, unredacted.

“There are threats by left wing radicals all over the internet threatening to dox people and they have shown they are violent,” Resist Marxism's Mark Sahady told Citizens' Dawn while expressing concerns he now has for his security at his home. “The document he posted was the letter sent to me by the Parks Department which showed my name, address, and phone number. I contacted the reporter and he took it down and apologized for posting it.”

One could chalk this highly irregular behavior up to incompetence by both the City of Boston and the Boston Globe. After all, in America and its cities we like to give people the benefit of the doubt; you know that whole “innocent until proven guilty.”

Citizens' Dawn reached out to the City of Boston's Department of Parks and Recreation Permit Department for comment and also attempted to obtain a copy of the letter of approval for the Citython race event. They have not responded to the message left on their voicemail or provided that letter.

Where are we?

In the wake of the Vegas shooting, which specialists Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer and Forensic Psychiatrist Dr. Michael Welner say was a “stranger mass-homicide” while likening it to the Hodgkinson shooting of Republican Congressman of Steve Scalise in June a few months prior.

In an Oct. 3 interview on Fox & Friends Welner suggests people carry out “stranger mass-homicides” for one of two reasons: 'notoriety' or 'a cause'. Given that “notoriety is typically a young mans crime,” Welner suggests that the Vegas Shooting was done for “a cause” given the target that was chosen: a country music Concert that has demographics which tend to include Trump supporters.

“It was a politically selected target.. the perception was that there was going to be a lot of pro gun folks there, Trump supporters at this concert. So therefore.. this was a legitimate target of political expression,” Shaffer said in an interview on The Story with Fox News' Martha MacCallum. “The very reason that Hodgkinson did what he did, and I believe Paddock did what he did, is because the left has encouraged the use of violence as an extension of political speech. There was no violence perpetrated against Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton during the run ups to the election so this has become a feature of desensitization by the left, the Kathy Griffin fake beheading of the President, things like this I think are what's pushing a lot of folks to believe now that somehow violence is politically justified.”

A recent example of the climate of politically justified violence the media is creating is when on Friday Nov. 3, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) suffered lung contusions and several broken ribs after being violently assaulted at his home.

“Jim Bullington, a former member of the city commission, knows both men,” Brandon Gee and Ed O'Keefe wrote in a Nov. 5 report for the Washington post. “He said Sunday that Boucher is divorced and lives alone. Bullington described Boucher as a socialist.”

“He’s pretty much the opposite of Rand Paul in every way,” Bullington said in an interview.
The neighbors had been known to have “heated discussions” about health care, Bullington said, adding that Boucher is an advocate of a national health system.

“A motive is not known, and there is no indication that the attack was political in nature,” the Post writers wrote. It's good to see that the Post is capable of skepticism regarding some things.

It would appear that nothing will stop the fear based race baiting “political discourse” by those on the left. They seem bent on inducing violence. On Oct. 30 a Virginia election ad was run depicting Ed Gillespe and his supporters as racists who want to run down and murder little kids of color, simultaneously suggesting that their political opponents are the ones who want us to live in a fearful society.

“Give me one example of Ed Gillespe's race baiting,” Tucker Carlson asked concerning the ad in an Oct. 30 interview on Tucker Carlson with Emily Tisch Sussman.

“By putting the Confederate Statues at the center of his campaign, by running ads that imply that most people who are immigrants are MS-13 or are defending MS-13,” Sussman replied before Tucker Carlson called her out remarking that Gillespe has never said or implied that, while she ignored the fact that Confederate statues and flags are symbols that don't represent racism or slavery for the vast majority of those who embrace those symbols.

This is something Chief of Staff General John Kelly articulated in comments he made about the Robert E Lee statue.

“It's inconceivable to me that you would take what we think now and apply it back then, I think it's just very very dangerous. It shows you how much of a lack of appreciation of history and what history is,” Kelly said. “I would tell you that Robert E Lee was an honorable man. He was a man that gave up his country to fight for his state which one hundred and fifty years ago was more important than country. It was always loyalty to state first back in those days. Now it's different, but the lack of ability to compromise led to the Civil War and men and women of good faith on both sides made their stand where their conscience had them make their stand.”

The Virginia ad made sure to picture the truck running down the kids with a confederate flag flying from the back, as well as a Gadsden flag license plate in the front, a flag that was a symbol of resistance to tyranny that is presently embraced by the Tea Party and many other conservatives. If you think that this was done accidentally then you are lying, and no one aware of the facts presented here believes you.

The following day the group behind the ad pulled it following a truck attack by an ISIS sympathizer in New York City. For some reason, throughout the whole day the mainstream media that is so quick to label all white people and Gadsden flag bearing Americans as racist xenophobes went to extraordinary lengths to exclude from their reports that the man was a Muslim shouting “Allahu Akbar” as he mowed down innocent people and plowed into a school bus, a scene that is sadly becoming more common. This attempt by the media to downplay the terrorism threat with Islam was detailed in a report by Fox News' Dan Gainor titled “NYC terror attack brings out terrible media bias; and other journalism failures.”

“Several outlets – ABC News, CBS News, CNN and HuffPost among them – used headlines about 'truck rampage' or something similar to a truck attacking the victims,” Gainor writes. “This was after news outlets were reporting the attacker had shouted 'Allahu Akbar' (Arabic for “God is greater”) as he exited his vehicle.”

Why the double standard when it comes to slanderous, broad labels? Not that there is a comparison when it comes to the quotients of the slanderous group associated with their respective symbols, which makes the willingness to go along with such a double standard even more alarming. One is reality, the other is what the Latino Victory Fund said was “a mirror up to the Republican Party,” as detailed in a Fox News report.

This politically correct, identity politics climate of divisive fear that is keeping people from communicating effectively is leading to real problems in the world. You can look to the reaction from a Mexican man to the election of Donald Trump that was posted to social media, during which he encouraged people to kill Trump and his supporters citing “if you could go back in time and kill Hitler and kill the Nazis, would you do it?” This is after coverage of the election by prominent politicians, pundits, and media outlets likened Trump's election to the election of Hitler, best exemplified in a Nov 7., 2017 BBC report titled “US election: The German comparing Trump's campaign to Hitler's.”

This dangerous rhetoric that amounts to a distortion of reality, which we saw was used by Mayor Marty Walsh when describing Boston Free Speech, is not just adding to excuses people use to carry out violence but it is also distorting reality to allow for such situations to come into fruition, as is what happened with the NYC Halloween attacks.

“This clearly was preventable,” Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer said in an interview with Martha MacCallum on The Story. “This individual was on the scope of radar of law enforcement back in 2015... The other thing about this Mosque in Patterson New Jersey, I've heard multiple politicians, Governor Cuomo and others, say 'this is a lone wolf.' This is not a lone wolf. This is now a pattern that's been tried and true by ISIS and while he doesn't have a formal support network, the very mosque he was attending is the place where I suspect he was radicalized. Now, one of the things notable, other folks have talked about the fact the NYPD had a program to monitor these Mosques for people being radicalized.”

And of course the Sharia advocate responsible for convincing law enforcement to dismantle such programs was none other than the Hamas tied Linda Sarsour, as was reported by KRPC's Ken Webster. Somehow, Sarsour was able to convince the NYPD that sending a plain clothed Detective to attend services at Mosques to monitor what the Imams were teaching was creating “psychological warfare in our community;” that this 'Demographics Unit' was just a product of bigoted “islamophobia.”

To the irrational mind, it doesn't matter if there is a mountain evidence from active investigations that prompted the creation of units like the 'Demographics Unit' and is leading police to surveil these areas; it doesn't matter if units like these have “saved lives,” which is what former NYPD Deputy Commisioner for Public Information Paul J. Browne explained in his April 20, 2014 Op-Ed for the New York Post is exactly what they have done.

“There were other plots since 9/11: to bomb the retaining wall at the World Trade Center and the PATH train, to take down the Brooklyn Bridge, to attack synagogues in Manhattan and Riverdale, to bomb fuel storage tanks at JFK,” Browne writes. “The list goes on. The plots had one thing common — New York City as a target. Any reassessment of the NYPD counterterrorism program should keep that in mind.”

ISIS Founders

But as the disbanding of the “Demographics Unit” would suggest, there would appear to be a deliberate attempt to distort reality on the basis of subjective feelings of being a victim that is having effects beyond a few misguided universities and students. This skewing of the record has influenced legislation and oversight as it has with the laws concerning the 'green card lottery,' which have been able to skate by without scrutiny given that statistical data had been recently found to be insufficient to warrant such scrutiny and a 'tolerant' political climate.

Particularly noteworthy is what we will dub “The Amy Mek Twitter Saga,” where Michael Flynn Jr., the son of former National Security Adviser Gen. Michael Flynn, re-tweeted a tweet by Amy Mek, an outspoken critic of Islam.

The crack reporters over at NBC seemed to infer that the story was that he re-tweeted an outspoken critic of Islam, or rather it's radical elements, rather than the content of Mek's tweet, as was shown by Ken Dilanian's Nov. 5, 2017 tweet “Mike Flynn Jr just re-tweeted this.” This was likely a result of the culture that had been created under the Obama administration.

The tweet, which asserted that Robert Mueller, present leader of the Special Counsel investigation into Russian interference in the election, worked with the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR) to purge FBI training materials offensive to Muslims while working as Director of the FBI. As was reported by Judicial Watch in their May 18, 2017 report “Russia Special Counsel Mueller Worked with Radical Islamist Groups to Purge Anti-Terrorism Training Material Offensive to Muslims,” CAIR is a front group for the radical Islamist group Hamas.

What this amounted to was an effort within the intelligence community to do exactly what the disbanding of the Demographics Unit accomplished in the NYPD, which was wholesale manipulation of the strategy to contain terrorism by bureaucratically orchestrating the deliberate disregard of relevant intelligence.

It was the kind of thing that General Flynn had brought up was going on under the Obama administration in Iraq and Syria where people were cooking, manipulating, downplaying or outright ignoring intelligence that was in turn allowing for ISIS to get the foothold they eventually did in the years from 2011 all the way through the end of Obama's Presidency.

“I think it was a decision. I think it was a willful decision,” Gen. Michael Flynn told Al Jazeera’s Mehdi Hasan in a January 13, 2016 interview.

Flynn was referencing reports like the now declassified DIA report that was presented in August 2012 which warned of exactly what we saw happen in Syria and Iraq: the Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI [Al- Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria,” being supported by “the West, Gulf countries and Turkey.”

Flynn would later criticize the CIA and their “strategy” in an October 2015 interview with the New York Times.

“They’ve lost sight of who they actually work for,” Flynn said. “They work for the American people. They don’t work for the president of the United States. Frankly, it’s become a very political organization.”

Despite reports like that of the DIA, under the direction of the CIA what was billed as a strategy for achieving regime change in Syria would continue. Eventually this 'strategy' would lead to the Arab Spring, Benghazi and the death of Ambassador John Christopher Stevens, the dismantling of any progress in Iraq and mass genocide of Christians and Muslims alike by ISIS over the next few years which would lead to the refugee crisis. This is the same refugee crisis that has been the justification to bring in an exorbitant amount of immigrants from any Muslim country into Europe and America.

This is not an opinion. These are facts; facts which, at this point, still make a difference. Not the kind of facts which were presented to us by the State Department about intolerant, insensitive white people doing things like making a video that triggers the entire Middle East.

Thanks to investigative reports done by the likes of Pulitizer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, such as “The Red line and the Rat Line,” we know that the CIA, at the behest of the Obama administration, set up an arms running operation with Turkey's Erdogan through Libya into Syria and that was the purpose of the CIA annex in Libya. It was those arms which wound up being used in the Benghazi attack.

“A highly classified annex to the report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdo─čan administrations,” Hersh writes. “It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria.”

A report that supports Flynn's assertion that 'willfull' decisions were made to allow for the advancement of ISIS was the Daily Beast's Nancy A. Youssef and Shane Harris Sept. 9. 2015 report titled “Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked.“

“The cancer was within the senior level of the intelligence command,” Youssef and Harris report one defense official said. “Two senior analysts at CENTCOM signed a written complaint sent to the Defense Department Inspector General in July alleging that the reports, some of which were briefed to President Obama, portrayed the terror groups as weaker than the analysts believe they are. The reports were changed by CENTCOM higher-ups to adhere to the administration’s public line that the U.S. is winning the battle against ISIS and al Nusra, al Qaeda’s branch in Syria, the analysts claim.
That complaint was supported by 50 other analysts, some of whom have complained about politicizing of intelligence reports for months. One person who knows the contents of the written complaint sent to the inspector general said it used the word 'Stalinist' to describe the tone set by officials overseeing CENTCOM’s analysis.”

Another report confirming the Saudi mass export of Islamist jihad in the west and throughout the world was the Dec. 25, 2016 WND report “Intel Report: Saudis Bankrolling Extremism,” which, after referencing a then recent German Intelligence report confirming Saudi funding of Islamic extremism in Germany, goes on to confirm this extensive history.

G.M. Davis, a Ph.D. from Stanford University and the author of “House of War: Islam’s Jihad Against the World,” argues the new report from German intelligence is simply a confirmation of what most educated observers already know: Saudi Arabia is “the leading government sponsor of Islamic terrorism in the West and around the world.”

“Since at least the late 1970s with the jihadist campaign against the Soviets in Afghanistan, the Saudi government and top-ranking individuals have pursued a policy of exporting jihad to the non-Muslim world as a means of spreading Wahhabist influence abroad as well as keeping a lid on violence at home,” he explained. “Saudi Arabia is a totalitarian Sharia state, utterly devoid of basic freedoms, in which homosexuals are beheaded, adulterers stoned, women routinely beaten in public, and children indoctrinated with a virulent hatred for Christians and Jews. That Saudi Arabia is still considered an ally of the West only testifies to the state of confusion in Western policy and the West’s own complicity in jihadist activity.”

Yet there are extensive intricacies and moral quandaries that us mere mortals cannot fathom when it comes to the US relationship with the Saudis, and this revelation of a strategy to combat an evil ideology. Obama made this clear when in April of 2015 he gave his response to the Atlantic after being pressed about the US' relationship with the Saudis: “it's complicated.”

Complicated in the sense that Obama wanted ISIS to grow, as was revealed in a leaked conversation with then Secretary of State John Kerry.

Under the direction of the Obama administration, the CIA did all of this given false pretext of use of Sarin gas by the democratically elected president of Syria Bashar al-Assad. If the strategy was to combat the evil ideology and the negative propaganda toward the west, why then would he and his administration implement a strategy that did just that in an effort to depose and upset the state in the region which is moderate, safe for people of other faiths, and democratic. If the administration cared so deeply about the refugees of this instigated conflict, then why would they not give any consideration to the Christians in Syria who were slaughtered as a result of this strategy.

This is the kind of thing that communist cabals in James Bond films orchestrate: destabilizing regions to break down national identity and allow for the institution of empires, or caliphates like that of the Ottomans.

Curiously, as whistleblower and former FBI translator Sibel Edmunds details in her Oct. 24, 2017 report titled “Targeting Michael Flynn & Shielding the Radical Cleric Gulen: Special Counsel Robert Mueller MUST Step Down,” the same Robert Mueller appointed Special Counsel is the Mueller who “used his position as Director of the FBI to shield and cover up [Turkish Imam Fetullah] Gulen’s criminal-terrorist network and operations, and take drastic measures to quash a whistleblower’s Gulen-related reports.”

“Not long after being appointed Mr. Mueller began targeting former national security adviser Lieutenant General Michael T. Flynn, expanded the investigation beyond the Russia-Gate probe, and began a furious pursuit of Mr. Flynn’s Turkish connections and his vocal stand on the wanted radical Islamic Cleric Fethullah Gulen,” Edmunds writes. “Mr. Mueller’s inquiries went from Russia-connections to Flynn’s outing of Gulen’s twenty five-billion-dollar sleeper terror cell in the United States. Not finding any substantial evidence against Flynn within the Russia-Gate scope, the Special Counsel team switched gears and started aTurkey-Gate. During the past several months Mr. Mueller’s prosecutors have used multiple grand juries to issue subpoenas for documents related to Mr. Flynn.”

'Tis the Season

This is the stuff Banana Republics are made of: arms smuggling and money laundering by rogue agencies and governments to other rogue agencies and governments; rogue, unaccountable Prosecutors unconstitutionally setting up their own Justice Department investigating high crimes that they themselves are caught up in, as is the case with the Uranium One deal orchestrated by the Clinton State Department that was later covered up.

That's not just Citizens' Dawn's editorial comments either.

In a Oct. 17, 2017 report for The Hill titled “FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration approved controversial nuclear deal with Moscow”, John Solomon and Alison Spann explain how “before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews... The investigation was ultimately supervised by then-U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, an Obama appointee who now serves as President Trump’s deputy attorney general, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, now the deputy FBI director under Trump, Justice Department documents show.”

Meanwhile, on Oct. 18, 2017 AG Jeff Sessions makes comments at the hill concerning Rosenstein being allowed to oversee the Uranium One investigation at the Department of Justice “It would be his decision.”

"We are at risk of a coup d'etat in this country if we allow an unaccountable person with no oversight to undermine the duly-elected President of the United States," Rep. Matt Gaetz said Wednesday Nov. 8, 2017 on the House Floor. "And I would offer that is precisely what is happening right now with the indisputable conflicts of interest that are present with Mr. Mueller and others at the Department of Justice.

After pointing out that the DNC paid for the 'Russian Dossier' 'intelligence' fabrication that was likely used to authorize the FISA warrants to spy on their political opposition, and that we would likely never find this out under Mueller's Special Counsel or Rosenstein overseeing anything concerning Russia at the DOJ, the congressman continued to highlight the ridiculous state of the Federal Justice System imposed by these conflicts of interest. “And why did Congress never hear from these informants? Well, its no surprise to me that you actually have Mr. Rosenstein's name on the signature block of the pleadings that sealed the information that could have shed light on this entire scandal,” Gaetz said.

Chairmen of the Senate Intelligence committee Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) has even come out during an Oct. 30 interview on the Ingraham Angle saying that “there is no possible way that the FBI did not know who paid for that dossier.” Nunes would go on to give significant insight into the state of the the nation's premiere law enforcement agency, which is now being revealed by the investigation into the Russian Dossier.

“We don't know if it's just Comey or if it's the whole FBI,” Nunes said before outlining the various elements obstructing the Senate committee's investigation, inferring that people within the FBI deliberately lied about, and withheld any information they had about the Fusion GPS dossier and that people within the intelligence community were leaking intelligence to obstruct the Senate investigation. “Remember it was all over me, originally going to the White House, saying that I had looked at documents where Trump administration officials had been unmasked, some of those ended up in the media. This is a major problem of leaks.”

To be clear the leaks the Congressman is referring to are whistle blowers blowing the whistle on some abuse of power, it is exactly the opposite: covering up such abuse by obstructing investigations. The 2016 election confirmed exactly what the founders of America feared with regards to tyrannical government: people leveraging the power given to the Government by the people, against the people, as is the case by what is a clear and present danger to the democratic process. This might be the kind of Tyranical, authoritarian practices that have prompted groups like 'Resist Marxism' to host gatherings like 'Rally for the Reupublic.' But putting words into people's mouths is not Citizens' Dawn's purpose. That's the job of politicians.

In another Oct. 26 interview with Neil Cavuto, Nunes explained how the intelligence agencies have been 'weaponized' by a political party.

“How is it that our government could approve a sale of twenty percent of our uranium at the same time that there was an open FBI investigation,” Nunes remarked. “Congress should have been briefed, at the time, on an ongoing investigation like this.”

These aren't baseless allegations of a political nature, these are factual discrepancies from the legal standards set by our country which is undermining our Democracy. There is a word for that. Here's a hint: it start's with the liberty Tree that falls with with the Season.

And its not the baseless kind, based on fabrications.

It's hard to prove intent by Obama himself, especially when it was designed for reports like the one by the DIA to never make it to administration officials and so the ones that did had key information removed so as to avoid any incriminating paper trail.

You can make some inferences though when while ignoring the threat of radical Islam over seas as part of a strategy to topple governments and reshape the middle east, at the highest levels of the Pentagon and in America's intelligence agencies and law enforcement were doing the same in America. Why on earth would this kind of strategy be carried out domestically? Why, oh why?

As we can see from the increasingly hostile environment, vague, sentimental, 'abstract' notions of addressing the problem of radical Islam do not work. Radical Islam is not something that can be contained by “magic words.” Radical Islam is the embodiment of stubborn ignorance. Stubborn ignorance won't listen to kind words. Yet still, 'tolerance' of intolerance and vapid sentiments of peace are still offered as the cutting edge strategy that is far beyond the comprehension of anyone outside the upper echelons of the political aristocracy, the intelligentsia, and the intelligence bureaucracies; outside the understanding of anyone not party to the agenda of political hacks.

This strategy was championed in the political arena by Obama himself who, in a June 14, 2016 speech to the press, Orwellianly attacked those who were critical of his refusal to use terms like 'radical Islam.'

“Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away,” former President Obama said. “This is a political distraction.”

If your jaw is not dropped at the sheer magnitude of this open doublespeak, give it another minute and let it really sink in deep. In the same speech criticizing people for not recognizing the Ideological nature of the enemy, he then goes on to suggest that the people who are criticizing his policy of not identifying the ideological enemy are off base because of the physical people his administration has 'taken off the battlefield.'

Just wow.

Not only has his strategy to call a threat by a different name, if any name at all, failed to make it go away, but this failure to identify the target has served as a political distraction that has allowed for the National Security of the US and its NATO allies to be compromised as migrants from compromised areas, which serve as breeding grounds for the evil ideology Obama referenced we are at war with, have been allowed into our countries with no legitimate way to verify that these people are not adherents of said ideology and thus not the enemy combatants with whom we are at war.

So, just to recap, we can't call something what it is with a term that distinguishes ideological disparities so we don't paint 'broad brush' and some how label all those who identify with the word Islam with the violent, barbaric practices preached by those who also identify with the word Islam. Riiiiiight. Also, when the training materials of law enforcement and intelligence services identify more specific things that can be associated with the threat, those elements are purged on the basis that they are offensive. Obama perfected the art of the bureaucratic troll.

Oh, and by the way, “there's no magic to the phrase 'radical Islam,” former President Obama said. “It's a political talking point. It's not a strategy. And the reason I am careful about how I describe this threat, has nothing to do with political correctness and everything to do with actually defeating extremism.”

I don't know about you, but logically processing this kind of linguistic diarrhea makes me gag.

The Amy Mek Twitter Saga isn't just about the criticism of Mueller and the Obama administration, it is more about the media's collusion in the biggest strategic blunder by any administration in the history of the country. Anyone combing through her twitter page can easily find that there is an abundance of evidence that suggests that there is such a thing as Radical Islam and it is not confined to the distant caves of Afghanistan or the deserts of Syria and Iraq.

As we touched on earlier, the Marxist, Neo-Fascist attempts by the big multinational, corporate media conglomerates to distort reality and stifle dissenting voices is posing a national security threat to the United States and the safety of ordinary, everyday Americans.

Continued in Part 2 of “The Battle for Boston” Series. Stay tuned.

Related Content Groups(1):
Comments: 0
*** By using and viewing the comments, you acknowledge that the views expressed herein do not necessarilly express the views of Citizens' Dawn and that Citizens' Dawn is not responsible for any content that is linked to outside of Citizens' Dawn's domain, which may be included within each citizen's comments.
Log in to leave a comment!
CD Featured Video:
Citizens' Dawn's Sponsors:
CD Featured Video:
CD Featured Video: